SED Fund logo
SED Fund
Sustainability, Equity and Diversity
CRM Decision Pathway
From kickoff to signed SOW — gated, evidence-led, bias-aware.
Total elapsed
6–8 weeks
Total cost (pathway)
$18,000 – $24,500* USD
Through Gate 2 + SOW. Implementation effort sits beyond this map. Should SED choose an alternative to Dynamics, additional scope is proposed for Branch B.

*If SED elects onsite Discovery, estimated travel cost adds ~$4,750.

00
1 week
$1,400 USD
Phase
Kickoff
Convene the room, confirm the mandate.
Inputs
  • Executive mandate
  • Current CRM context
Deliverables
  • Project charter
  • Executive sponsor confirmed
  • Working agreement
Outputs
  • Named project team
  • Cadence + decision rights
01
Onsite
1 week
$9,000 USD
Remote
2 weeks
$4,200 USD
Open dedicated page
Phase
Discovery (Onsite preferred, Remote available)
Stakeholder map · Interviews · Working agenda.
Inputs
  • Stakeholder list
  • Stated Dynamics preference
Deliverables
  • Stakeholder map
  • Requirements brief
  • Future-state narrative
Outputs
  • Validated needs
  • Bias-tested assumptions
  • Fit-gap signal
Key questions
  • What is driving the Dynamics preference — capability, cost, comfort, or contract?
  • Where does the future state diverge from what Dynamics does best?
  • Which systems must the CRM integrate with on day one, and which can wait?
  • Are integrations point-to-point, via middleware, or part of a broader data platform play?
  • Which data flows and master records are non-negotiable?
G1
1 week
$4,600 USD
● Decision Gate
Confirm Technology Path
Is Microsoft Dynamics the right answer for the future state?
Inputs to decision
  • Discovery findings
  • Fit-gap analysis
  • TCO sketch
Outputs from decision
  • Endorsed technology direction
  • Documented rationale
← Branch Acontinue
Microsoft Dynamics
Standardize on the Microsoft stack — partner-led implementation
Branch B →
Alt CRM or Bespoke
Independent evaluation track
Open dedicated page
G2
2 weeks
$4,600 USD
Decision Gate
Gate 2 · Select Implementation Partner
Interviews, working sessions, scoped demonstrations — evaluated against our readiness profile.
Inputs
  • Internal capacity for ongoing maintenance
  • Platform integration pipelines
  • Security management posture
  • Budget for implementation
  • Budget for annual support
Activities
  • Capability interviews
  • Reference checks
  • Scoped demos against our data
  • Commercial review
Outputs
  • Selected partner
  • Scorecard + rationale
Selection criteria
  • Time-zone availability
  • Experience working with similar organizations
  • Ability to provide ongoing support
  • Technical skill and Dynamics depth
03
TBD
Phase
Contracting · SOW
MSA, statement of work, governance setup.
Deliverables
  • Signed MSA + SOW
  • Governance model
  • Day-one plan
Outputs
  • Implementation kickoff scheduled
↳ Parallel Track
If Gate 1 lands on Alt CRM or Bespoke
The Alt path runs on its own governance — separate vendor evaluation, separate sourcing, separate implementation. The phases below mirror the Dynamics spine but stay independent.
A1
Alt-CRM Evaluation
Run a parallel vendor / bespoke evaluation.
A2
Select Vendor or Build Path
Choose product, partner, or bespoke build.
Alt implementation begins
Own delivery model, separate from the Dynamics path.
End of pathwayGates: Confirm path · Select partner